Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 03:07

Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Thank you.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
32.4 Patch Notes - Blizzard Entertainment
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Scientists reveal a surprising link between depression and microbes in your mouth - PsyPost
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What’s next?
Aut consectetur debitis ullam.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
How does a 45-year-old man get a girlfriend?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Here's One Reason To Buy A Lucid Air Over A Tesla Or Rivian - InsideEVs
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Advice for trying GLP-1 drugs for weight loss from a doctor who's been there - NPR